Lots of folks were upset with how the Supreme Court ruled so narrowly in the
Bilski case and how they refused to make a clear statement on the patentability of software. It did seem clear that some judges
didn't believe that software should be patentable, and we were just discussing how the Supreme Court might
still invalidate software patents, if given a good case on the subject. In the meantime, though, as a small silver lining, it does appear that the Bilski ruling has resulted in at least
some software patents tossed.
A new study, covering the year since the Bilsky ruling, found that the Board of Patent Appeals appears to be
more willing to reject software patent claims. On top of that, the district courts' ruling on software patents also seem willing to take the Bilski lead and invalidate software patents (though, here, we're talking about the ridiculously small sample size of four -- though in all four cases, the patents were rejected). While, obviously, many would prefer a more bright line rejection of software patents, it's at least good to see that the courts and the BPAI seem to be somewhat cognizant of the idea that the bar for such patents should be reasonably high.
Permalink |
Comments |
Email This Story



Source: http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110729/04255015315/silver-linings-bilski-ruling-does-seem-to-be-limiting-some-software-patents.shtml
pc world store computer world pc magazine dixons
No comments:
Post a Comment